All Insights

Ruling by Ninth Circuit Gives Liberal Interpretation to EEOC’s Duty To Conciliate Under Supreme Court’s Mach Mining Test

In an important decision issued last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mach Mining v. EEOC that a court

By |2016-04-01T12:58:44-05:004/1/2016|Categories: Agency Enforcement, Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , , |Comments Off on Ruling by Ninth Circuit Gives Liberal Interpretation to EEOC’s Duty To Conciliate Under Supreme Court’s Mach Mining Test

Mike Eastman Testifies at EEOC Public Hearing on Proposed Pay Data Changes to the EEO-1

Mike Eastman, NT Lakis Of Counsel, was one of several witnesses who presented testimony last week at the Equal Employment Opportunity

By |2016-03-25T12:39:19-05:003/25/2016|Categories: Affirmative Action and Diversity, Compensation, Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , , , , , |Comments Off on Mike Eastman Testifies at EEOC Public Hearing on Proposed Pay Data Changes to the EEO-1

Labor Department Finalizes Revisions to “Persuader” Rule, Increasing Reporting Requirements for Employers and Consultants

The Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) has long required an employer and labor relations consultant to disclose details

By |2020-09-21T13:55:20-05:003/23/2016|Categories: Labor Relations|Tags: , , , |Comments Off on Labor Department Finalizes Revisions to “Persuader” Rule, Increasing Reporting Requirements for Employers and Consultants

Fourth Circuit Rules That Different Physical Testing Standards for Men and Women Do Not Necessarily Violate Title VII

In what the court refers to as a “relatively novel issue,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

By |2016-03-20T14:04:36-05:003/20/2016|Categories: Discrimination and Harassment, Talent Acquisition and Management|Tags: , , , , |Comments Off on Fourth Circuit Rules That Different Physical Testing Standards for Men and Women Do Not Necessarily Violate Title VII