Amicus Brief

NT Lakis Files Brief On Behalf of CWC With Supreme Court Once Again Urging Reversal of Controversial Ninth Circuit Equal Pay Act Ruling in Rizo v. Yovino

For the second time in three years, NT Lakis has filed on behalf of CWC a “friend-of-the-court” brief with the

By |2020-09-21T13:54:16-05:005/10/2020|Categories: Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , , , |Comments Off on NT Lakis Files Brief On Behalf of CWC With Supreme Court Once Again Urging Reversal of Controversial Ninth Circuit Equal Pay Act Ruling in Rizo v. Yovino

NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief With Supreme Court, Urging Review and Rejection of California Rule Disfavoring Arbitration Agreements

NT Lakis attorneys have filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging the Justices to consider whether a

By |2019-07-07T22:28:45-05:007/7/2019|Categories: Arbitration and Dispute Resolution|Tags: , , |Comments Off on NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief With Supreme Court, Urging Review and Rejection of California Rule Disfavoring Arbitration Agreements

NT Lakis’s Brief to the Eighth Circuit in Harris v. Union Pacific Argues That Lower Court Erred in Certifying ADA Class Action

NT Lakis has filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in a case

By |2020-09-21T13:54:28-05:005/17/2019|Categories: Disability, Accommodations, and Leaves, Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , , , , |Comments Off on NT Lakis’s Brief to the Eighth Circuit in Harris v. Union Pacific Argues That Lower Court Erred in Certifying ADA Class Action

Supreme Court, Agreeing With Arguments Raised in NT Lakis Friend-of-the Court Brief, Rules in Lamps Plus v. Varela That Class Arbitration Cannot Be Inferred From “Contractual Ambiguity”

In another important ruling reaffirming the strong federal policy favoring arbitration, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 5 – 4

By |2019-05-05T21:59:38-05:005/5/2019|Categories: Arbitration and Dispute Resolution|Tags: , , |Comments Off on Supreme Court, Agreeing With Arguments Raised in NT Lakis Friend-of-the Court Brief, Rules in Lamps Plus v. Varela That Class Arbitration Cannot Be Inferred From “Contractual Ambiguity”

NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief With Ninth Circuit, Arguing Trial Court Ruled Correctly in Denying Certification to Purported Class of More Than 8,600

NT Lakis lawyers have filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a

By |2019-04-21T23:44:05-05:004/21/2019|Categories: Compensation, Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , , , , |Comments Off on NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief With Ninth Circuit, Arguing Trial Court Ruled Correctly in Denying Certification to Purported Class of More Than 8,600

NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief With Supreme Court, Arguing That Filing a Charge Is a Mandatory Prerequisite To Bringing a Lawsuit Under Title VII

NT Lakis attorneys have filed a “friend-of-the-court” brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in an important case that addresses the

By |2019-03-24T15:28:13-05:003/24/2019|Categories: Agency Enforcement, Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , , , , |Comments Off on NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief With Supreme Court, Arguing That Filing a Charge Is a Mandatory Prerequisite To Bringing a Lawsuit Under Title VII

NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief with Supreme Court, Arguing It’s Time for Courts To Stop Giving Controlling Deference to Agency Interpretations of Their Own Ambiguous Regulations

NT Lakis attorneys have filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in an important case that raises the

By |2019-02-25T09:02:31-05:002/24/2019|Categories: Agency Enforcement|Tags: , , |Comments Off on NT Lakis Attorneys File Brief with Supreme Court, Arguing It’s Time for Courts To Stop Giving Controlling Deference to Agency Interpretations of Their Own Ambiguous Regulations