Ninth Circuit Rules That Mandatory Arbitration Class Waivers Violate Federal Labor Law, Widening Split Among Federal Circuits
Widening a growing split among the federal appeals courts regarding the legality of a class action waiver contained in an
NT Lakis Lawyers Create “Federal Compliance Initiative Scorecard” Summarizing Major Employment-Related Actions Undertaken During the Obama Administration
In light of the very active employment-related regulatory and policy agenda that has been pursued by federal enforcement agencies during
Ruling by Seventh Circuit Endorses NLRB’s Position That Arbitration Class Waivers Violate Federal Labor Law
Contrary to holdings by every other federal appeals court to have addressed the issue, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Surprise Ruling By California Supreme Court Rejects Claims That Employment Arbitration Agreement Is Unenforceable
In a recent development that may make it less difficult for employers to get a state court to enforce an
Anti-Arbitration Ruling by Tenth Circuit Cites Costs and Fee-Splitting Provisions
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled recently that an arbitration agreement requiring an individual to pay
Supreme Court Holds Once Again That Federal Arbitration Act Preempts Anti-Arbitration Interpretation of State Law
Agreeing with a number of arguments presented in a friend-of-the-court brief submitted by NT Lakis lawyers, the U.S. Supreme Court
NT Lakis Files Brief with Supreme Court, Urging Rejection of California Anti-Arbitration Rule
NT Lakis has filed a "friend-of-the-court" brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in an important case implicating the general enforceability