Monthly Archives: September 2016

Handling Applicant Reasonable Accommodation Requests

NT Lakis attorneys and non-attorney professionals are pleased to present the latest in our “AAP Tune-Up” series of guides designed

By |2016-09-30T14:55:29-05:009/30/2016|Categories: Affirmative Action and Diversity, Compliance Tools, Disability, Accommodations, and Leaves, Talent Acquisition and Management|Tags: , , , |Comments Off on Handling Applicant Reasonable Accommodation Requests

12th Annual Corporate “Litigation Trends” Survey Continues To Show That Labor and Employment Lawsuits Are a Main Concern for Company Lawyers

The latest annual survey on corporate litigation trends conducted by the law firm of Norton Rose Fulbright LLP finds that

By |2016-09-30T14:50:11-05:009/30/2016|Categories: Agency Enforcement, Discrimination and Harassment, Wage and Hour, Whistleblowing and Retaliation|Tags: , , , |Comments Off on 12th Annual Corporate “Litigation Trends” Survey Continues To Show That Labor and Employment Lawsuits Are a Main Concern for Company Lawyers

Ninth Circuit Rules That Mandatory Arbitration Class Waivers Violate Federal Labor Law, Widening Split Among Federal Circuits

Widening a growing split among the federal appeals courts regarding the legality of a class action waiver contained in an

By |2016-09-23T15:11:33-05:009/23/2016|Categories: Agency Enforcement, Arbitration and Dispute Resolution, Labor Relations, Policies and Practices|Tags: , , , , , , |Comments Off on Ninth Circuit Rules That Mandatory Arbitration Class Waivers Violate Federal Labor Law, Widening Split Among Federal Circuits

ADA Ruling by Sixth Circuit Defers to Employer’s Judgment in Finding That Driving Was an Essential Function of Plaintiff’s Job

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled recently that driving was an essential function of an employee’s

By |2020-09-21T13:55:12-05:009/23/2016|Categories: Disability, Accommodations, and Leaves, Discrimination and Harassment|Tags: , |Comments Off on ADA Ruling by Sixth Circuit Defers to Employer’s Judgment in Finding That Driving Was an Essential Function of Plaintiff’s Job