EEOC Proposes Rule To Clarify Permissible Use of Corporate Wellness Programs Under GINA
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has published a proposed rule that would revise the agency's existing regulations under the
Guide for Preparing Managers and Supervisors on OFCCP’s New Pay Transparency Rule
NT Lakis has created a "Talking Points" guide designed to educate managers and supervisors on the new "pay transparency" rule
Cross-Border Data Transfers in Jeopardy After the European Union High Court Rules That “Safe Harbor” Framework Is Invalid
The European Union's (EU) highest court has ruled that a "Safe Harbor" agreement negotiated between the EU and the United
FEDERAL COURT SAYS PLAINTIFF’S FALSE CLAIMS ACT COMPLAINT NOT SUPPORTED BY ALLEGED VETS-100 REPORTING DEFICIENCIES
In a long-running case that has been to the U.S. Supreme Court and back, a federal trial court has dismissed
CALIFORNIA FAIR PAY ACT MAKES PROVING PAY DISCRIMINATION MUCH EASIER
California has enacted a new law - the Fair Pay Act - that amends the state's existing Equal Pay Act
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DUE DILIGENCE GUIDELINES
NT Lakis has prepared an updated guide for conducting a comprehensive due diligence assessment of a company's affirmative action compliance
SUMMARY OF RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS UNDER FEDERAL EEO AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION LAWS
NT Lakis has prepared an updated Summary of Recordkeeping Requirements Under Federal Fair Employment and Affirmative Action Laws. The table
DC CIRCUIT CONFIRMS REGULAR AND PREDICTABLE ATTENDANCE CAN BE ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION
In a case arising under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has
EEOC ORDERED TO PAY COMPANY’S ATTORNEY’S FEES FOR DEFENDING COMMISSION’S BACKGROUND CHECK LAWSUIT
A federal trial court in Maryland has slapped the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) with a substantial attorney's fees
THIRD CIRCUIT SAYS PAID SUSPENSION DURING MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATION NOT DISCRIMINATION
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that suspending an employee with pay pending an investigation