Guide to the Compliance Implications of Campus Recruiting
Each year many employers participate in college career fairs, most often with the goal of interviewing potential candidates for the
Assessing the Pros and Cons of Performance Improvement Plans
In cases where an employee is not meeting performance expectations, a company may elect to put the person on a
Best Practices for Centrally Managing and Tracking “Good Faith Efforts” To Meet OFCCP Requirements
In a typical compliance evaluation, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) will often demand documented evidence of the
Updated Primer on Employment Selection Testing, With Accompanying Employment Testing Self-Audit Checklist
NT Lakis attorneys are pleased to present our Primer on Employment Selection Testing, along with an accompanying Employment Testing Self-Audit
Guide to OFCCP Recordkeeping Implications When Changing ATS or HRMS Platforms
For federal contractors subject to the jurisdiction of the Labor Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), the company’s
EEAC’s Third Annual Talent Acquisition Compliance Summit
Earlier this month, more than 140 employer representatives gathered in Dallas, Texas, for the Equal Employment Advisory Council’s (EEAC) third
“The Compliance Implications of Job Descriptions,” Part II: 15 Things Every Employer Should Consider When Drafting, Implementing, and Auditing Job Qualifications
NT Lakis is pleased to present Part II in our new series of guides on “The Compliance Implications of Job
Gallup’s 2017 “State of the American Workplace” Survey Shows Worker Engagement Has Increased Slightly Over Last Decade
Findings contained in the most recent “State of the American Workplace” survey conducted by the Gallup organization reveal that the
The Compliance Implications of Job Descriptions, Part I
NT Lakis is pleased to announce that our staff has created a new a series of compliance-oriented guides focused on
High-Profile Tech Industry “No Poaching” Settlement Serves as a Reminder of Potential Workplace Antitrust Risks
Parties to a long-running case accusing company defendants of colluding to suppress competition by pledging not to “poach” each other’s